07 315 04076 support@softwareinsight.com.au
Mon–Fri 8:30–17:30 AEST softwareinsight.com.au Serving Australian business since 2000
Home › Projects › Freight & Logistics

Freight & Logistics case study

Freight & Logistics · Insight Ledger + Insight Reports, 34 staff, three depots

A family-owned freight company running lines out of three regional depots had outgrown its bookkeeping. The ledger lived in one spreadsheet per depot, consolidated by the office manager into a master workbook whose size had begun corrupting on save. Month end took nine working days. The directors approved large purchases by intuition, because the figures arrived too late to inform anything.

The difficulty

Three depots meant three charts of accounts that had drifted apart over a decade, so like-for-like cost comparison was impossible. Driver fuel-and-maintenance claims arrived as paper dockets, keyed twice, disputed often. The office manager — the only person who understood the master workbook — was planning to retire within the year, taking the reporting capability with her.

Project snapshot

  • SectorFreight & Logistics
  • Modules deployedInsight Ledger, Insight Reports
  • Duration13 weeks, including a two-month parallel run
  • Written up withClient permission; identifying detail removed

Numbers quoted in this study were measured by the client before and after the change — they are not our estimates. Where a figure could not be measured cleanly, it has been left out rather than rounded flatteringly.

What we changed

Process review ran as three half-day workshops, one per depot, so every site saw its own working mapped. We unified the chart of accounts around one structure with depot cost centres, migrated two years of history per depot, and ran a two-month parallel consolidation in which the old workbook and Insight Ledger were reconciled line by line. Fuel claims moved to a standard intake form with photo attachment in Insight Docs, feeding the ledger without rekeying. The Insight Reports pack replaced the master workbook with six dashboards the directors helped design.

The results

  • Month end reduced from nine working days to two.
  • Depot-for-depot cost comparison available for the first time in the company’s history.
  • Retirement of the master workbook completed without loss of knowledge.
  • Fuel claim disputes down to near zero — the docket photo travels with the claim.
Three depots reconciling into one ledger
A Monday-morning pack in place of a nine-day close
The parallel run

Both systems were reconciled for two months, so the office manager retired with the company already trusting the new figures.

If your organisation looks like this one

If month end is the worst week of your month, count the hours: who works late, how often, and what the reconciliation consumes. That figure is the business case. Run a parallel run before decommissioning anything, and put the person who understands the old system in charge of signing off the new one.

To see how a project like this would run against your own calendar and numbers, ask us for a written quote — A ledger-and-reporting rescue is usually a one-page quote.

Questions this case study raises

How long did staff need to become productive?
The finance clerk was productive within a fortnight, helped by training that used the depot’s own month-end pack as exercise material. Depot managers took to the dashboards in a single Monday-morning session — they had asked for two of the six by name. The office manager, whose retirement loomed over the project, spent her final month verifying rather than keying, and her sign-off of the parallel run is the document the directors still point to.
What would you do differently?
Start the fuel-claim scanning two weeks earlier than we did — it was originally wave two, and the paper backlog at one depot grew faster than planned. Everything else followed the method: the two-month parallel run was the client’s own insistence, and it was the right one; the retirement deadline gave the project a spine it might otherwise have lacked.